This entry was posted onFebruary 9th, 2010 at 2:54 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can Trackback..
Please FSM yes, VLOG!I hate your politics (although there is this one vid of you drunk on blog tv in a bikini for breast cancer, ahh anyway) so anything else is intrestingMore than just being trollie here, I think it helps me get past some of the more irritating material when I can see other aspects of your life, like that library or that you are in school, gives it all a sociological slant I can appreciateAfter all the only reason I care is to see what fellow atheist are saying now
Good point. Plus, their high head-to-body mass ratio would ensure splattering results while maintaining a minimal discrepancy of the vector I was discussing earlier. We might have to do some field tests and share results.
l say why not, vlog away!The Army man would take 3.2 seconds.
February 9, 2010 2:57 am | #1We want a booty shake video.
February 9, 2010 3:05 am | #2This was a really impressive library. Where is it?
February 9, 2010 4:03 am | #3Ohio State
February 9, 2010 4:49 am | #4what a great library!.you have beautiful eyes
February 9, 2010 5:09 am | #5the brain video was awesome
February 9, 2010 5:10 am | #6Please FSM yes, VLOG!I hate your politics (although there is this one vid of you drunk on blog tv in a bikini for breast cancer, ahh anyway) so anything else is intrestingMore than just being trollie here, I think it helps me get past some of the more irritating material when I can see other aspects of your life, like that library or that you are in school, gives it all a sociological slant I can appreciateAfter all the only reason I care is to see what fellow atheist are saying now
February 9, 2010 5:19 am | #7If there arent any babies around, you could use a bowling ball and a baseball to do the gravataional test.
February 9, 2010 5:25 am | #8Good point. Plus, their high head-to-body mass ratio would ensure splattering results while maintaining a minimal discrepancy of the vector I was discussing earlier. We might have to do some field tests and share results.
February 9, 2010 5:54 am | #9We can collaborate on the paper. I hope it survives the peer review process.
February 9, 2010 6:24 am | #10